This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 17:20, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Seems nonsensical. Gets 30 Google hits, most of which relate to a graphics company by this name. Separating the words only jacks it up to 140 Google hits, mostly relating to an icon you might find on your desktop. I say delete, but maybe someone else knows something I don't. --BD2412 23:19, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete this nonsense. It's far too brillig. Edeans 03:02, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Let's put it out to gyre and gimble in the wabe. Delete (as NN and/or vanity). Radiant_* 12:07, Mar 18, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.